Financial statements are often seen as a “tick-box” exercise. Approaching the preparation of financial statements in this way means that important decisions about their content will only be decided after year end. As financial statements reflect historical events based on the facts and circumstances that existed at that time, it would be difficult to “re-invent” this data after the financial year. It would be equally difficult making accounting policy and materiality decisions for the first time during the preparation of the financial statements. Yet, most preparers leave these decisions to the last minute!
Changes in accounting policies
Most changes in accounting policies result from new accounting standards or changes to existing standards. To effectively plan to implement a change in accounting policy, an entity may need to know what the changes are; sometimes as early as two years before the effective date. Consider the following example:
|
Applying materiality
We often receive questions from preparers about whether an item is material, usually in the context of a disagreement with the auditors. It is almost impossible for an external party to answer whether something is material for an entity if they do not have a documented materiality framework in place.
Materiality ensures that the most relevant information is provided to users of the financial statements as this information potentially could affect the decisions they want to make. A materiality framework should be developed and adopted before the start of any financial reporting period. Having a materiality framework in place means documenting an entity’s users; the decisions the users want to take; what is considered material quantitatively and qualitatively; and how this affects accounting policies, including recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure.
A materiality framework should be developed by management, discussed by the Audit Committee and approved by the relevant governance structure. As the auditors are invited to attend Audit Committees as observers, they should be able to provide feedback about whether management’s assumptions are appropriate.
Having a formal, documented process for considering materiality means that deliberate action is taken by management in developing its systems, data requirements, policies, processes and preparation of the financial statements.
Bringing it all together
The financial statements are often long and provide information that has no or little impact on how users will hold officials accountable and make financial, economic and social decisions. It is critical that preparers identify what is most important to users, and this requires deliberate actions by management. It is critical that preparers engage with users, identify what they need, and put this into action by developing a materiality framework and planning to adopt changes in the financial statements well in advance of their effective date.
Plan to publish a great set of financial statements 🧮